Feasibility of a National Screening Program for Venous Disease
Surgeon General's Workshop on Deep Vein Thrombosis
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
SLIDE 1: Feasibility of a National Screening Program for Venous Disease
Robert B. McLafferty, M.D.
Professor of Surgery
Division of Vascular Surgery
Department of Surgery
Southern Illinois University
Springfield, Illinois
SLIDE 2: National Venous Screening
The Problem
Photograph of ulcerated foot.
- Ten times more people have venous disease compared to arterial disease
- 24 million – varicose veins
- 6 million – skin changes
- ½ million – stasis ulcers
- DVT: 1 in 20 persons over lifetime
- DVT: 600,000 hospital admissions
- PE: third most common cause of hospital death; 650,000 annually
SLIDE 3: National Venous Screening
Background
- American Venous Forum (graphic of AVF Logo)
- American Vascular Association (graphic of AVA Logo)
Graphic of the United States with symbols representing 17 screening sites.
Graphic of AVA products.
SLIDE 4: National Venous Screening
Methods
- Venous Screening Instrument
- Demographic questions
- VTE risk assessment / score
- (Caprini, et al)
- Screening venous duplex (CFV, SFJ, PV)
- Reflux
- Obstruction
- Lower extremity inspection (Class 1 – 6 )
- Exit interview/ report card
- Accommodate 5-7 people / hour
SLIDE 5: National Venous Screening
Results: 476 People – 17 Centers
Gender
Race
Mean age: 59 (26-91) Mean BMI: 28 (16-51) Other demographics
“Blood thinners”
Why are you here today?
|
SLIDE 6: National Venous Screening
Results: VTE Risk Assessment
Bar chart.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total points | 4.6 | 18.3 | 19.4 | 19.8 | 14.4 | 8.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.21 |
| Low (0-1) | 4.6% |
| Moderate (2) | 18.3% |
| High (3-4) | 39.2% |
| Very high (>5) | 37.7% |
SLIDE 7: National Venous Screening
Results: Obstruction and Reflux
5% with obstruction
| CFV | SFJ | PV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right leg | 1% | 1% | 2% |
| Left leg | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| CFV | SFJ | PV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right leg | 12% | 16% | 7% |
| Left leg | 11% | 18% | 10% |
SLIDE 8: National Venous Screening
Results: Clinical Class
- Class 0 (none) 15%
- Class 1 (spider veins) 33%
- Class 2 (varicose veins) 32%
- Class 3 (swollen leg) 11%
- Class 4 (skin changes) 8%
- Class 5 (healed ulcer) 1%
- Class 6 (ulcer) 0.2%
SLIDE 9: National Venous Screening
Few Comparisons
- Increasing VTE risk points more likely to have SFJ or PV reflux (p=0.01)
- Caucasians more likely to be in high/very high VTE risk category compared to African-Americans (p=0.02)
- Significant correlation between VTE risk points and clinical class (r=0.16, p=0.002)
- Those with reflux more likely to have higher class rating (p=0.0001)
SLIDE 10: National Venous Screening
Observations
- Abbreviated duplex screening exam is validated – significantly more likely to have reflux with increasing CEAP clinical class
- Scope of the risk and presence of venous disease necessitates continued action in the public arena
- Given the prevalence for the risk and presence of venous disease, public and private support is needed
- A National Venous Screening Program is feasible on a widespread scale and may lead to saving lives
SLIDE 11: National Venous Screening
Mission
- To provide a free comprehensive national screening program to the public that:
- educates about venous thromboembolism, varicose veins, and chronic venous insufficiency
- identifies those at risk for VTE, the presence of venous obstruction or reflux, and the presence of chronic venous insufficiency.
- empowers those to inform their physician and family of their risk or presence of venous disease
SLIDE 12: National Venous Screening
Goals 2006-2007 and beyond...
- Venous screening to occur in every state
- Welcome government / industry partners
- Facilitate increased interaction with screening sites
- Provide more information for primary care physicians through education and empower-ment of people screened



